0%
Built for
Built for Community
Built for Sustainability
Built for Progress
Built for Everyone
Built for Innovation
Built for Generations
Built for Opportunity
Built for Industry
Built for Comfort
Built for Enjoyment
Built for Empowerment
Built for Growth
Built for Life
Built for Community
Built for Sustainability
Built for Progress
Built for Everyone
Built for Innovation
Built for Generations
Built for Opportunity
Built for Industry
Built for Comfort
Built for Enjoyment
Built for Empowerment
Built for Growth

Understanding and Evaluating the Impact of Dental Program Accreditation

Professional accreditation provides an assessment of the quality of training delivered by education providers and a mechanism for accountability against professional standards. It ensures that education providers produce graduates who are sufficiently competent to join the workforce and, within the healthcare sector, ensures graduates can perform their roles safely and effectively. Although approaches differ, the ultimate goal is to ensure the public receive safe and high-quality care from practitioners who graduate from accredited programs. However, despite the widespread implementation of professional accreditation, there is a limited evidence base regarding its impacts and how to enhance these.

Phase 1

To better understand the impact of accreditation, the ADC commissioned RAND Australia to undertake a research project titled Understanding and evaluating the impact of dental program accreditation.

The research aimed to develop a framework that will help the ADC to identify and measure whether its accreditation activities are effective in producing competent and safe dental practitioners and to assess the overall impact of accreditation on the oral health of the Australian population.

The framework articulates the ways in which ADC accreditation activities support their intended outcomes and impacts. It highlights the dual nature of ADC’s activities:

  • the activities the ADC does to accredit individual programs of study; and,
  • the broader strategic activities that are undertaken to support and improve accreditation standards and processes.

It brings together a logic model, mechanisms of impact, indicators and strategies for measuring impact.

Phase 2

To further test and refine this framework, in 2024–25 the ADC commissioned RAND Australia to undertake broader stakeholder consultation to highlight the importance of program accreditation within health and professional accreditation more broadly. This research (Phase 2) explored stakeholders’ perspectives about the ADC’s accreditation activities and proposed logic model for generating impact in greater detail.

The applicability of the ADC’s impact mechanisms, specified in the Phase 1 research, was examined. Recommendations were also provided for how these impact mechanisms can be leveraged to assist the ADC to improve its impact against its strategic and accreditation objectives aligned to public health outcomes.

Findings were published in the 2025 report, Increasing the impact of dental program accreditation processes: Identifying strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Key Findings

  • Education providers (60 per cent) and assessors (73 per cent) generally believed that the ADC’s accreditation process effectively contributes to ensuring that dental education programs produce safe graduates.
  • Most education providers and assessors also looked favourably on the outcomes and impact of the ADC’s accreditation process on education providers, with a majority ‘agreeing’ or ‘strongly agreeing’ with related questions.
  • Although education providers and assessors generally felt that the accreditation process led to positive changes across open-ended responses, a few raised perceptions related to a lack of (or a lack of knowledge of) accountability mechanisms.
  • Education providers raised the need for strong institutional support, including adequate governance and knowledge-sharing, as well as adequate program staff with appropriate experience.

Recommendations

The report outlined several actionable recommendations to enhance the ADC’s impact. These include ways to better leverage existing mechanisms to strengthen alignment with both strategic and accreditation objectives, aligned to public health outcomes.